Promiscuity The Death of Love
November 9, 2010
Why women today are losing the ability to love, and how men must adjust.
From makow.com
by Henry Makow Ph.D.
If a young woman today said she was saving her virginity for her husband, she'd be considered hopelessly old fashioned. She'd be treated with disdain, as polite society treated a whore 100 years ago.
This is a measure of the triumph of Satanism, the "religion" of the modern world, also known as secularism. Not coincidentally, virgins also had to hide their purity in Bolshevik Russia.
The defining characteristic of civilization is the consecration of sex to marriage, or at the very least, love and courtship. Marriage and family are the red blood cells of a healthy society and the basis for procreation.
Satanists understand this very well. That's why they used "sexual liberation," to undermine humanity. As Giuseppe Mazzini said, "we corrupt in order to conquer."
They are like the devil. Corruption is a form of conquest.
FREE LOVE IS AN OXYMORON
The more sexual partners a young woman has, she less she is able to love a man. A woman's love must be exclusive. It must be focused on her husband, the father of her children. She must preserve her soul for him. That's what her body represents. By becoming a sexual free agent, she loses the ability to love.
For a woman, sex is an act of self-sacrifice and surrender. By definition, it requires trust, i.e. love and devotion to one man. When she has casual sex, inevitably she is disappointed and feels used. She starts to hate men and falls victim to feminism and lesbianism.
When men were required to get married in order to have sex, women were courted and loved. Later, they were honored for their contribution as wife and mother. Far from protecting "women's rights," feminism has left them twisting in the wind.
The separation of sex from marriage, i.e. "sexual liberation," is one of the principle ways satanism has killed love.
Wanton sex has become a substitute for love. Young women now market themselves as sex partners, not wives and mothers. Men are also trained to seek sex.
"Homosexual rights" is designed to make heterosexuals behave like homosexuals. Very few homosexuals marry. Very few have children. This is the model the elite envisages for mankind.
The Illuminati want us to be isolated, alienated and tractable.
A woman who is saving herself for marriage should be commended. She is resisting social pressure ( i.e. social engineering ) and obeying her instincts instead.
LOWERING EXPECTATIONS
Honeymooners.jpgThrough the mass media, the Illuminati brainwash us to think romantic love and sex are a universal panacea that cane replace religion (God.)
How many movies and songs are based on the assumption that some perfect person is the answer to our problems? Woody Allen is 75 and he's still chasing this romantic chimera in his movies. This is arrested development.
People aren't meant to be loved as though they were perfect. No one is. Only God is perfect and that is where our love should be directed. As you know, I define God in terms of spiritual ideals such as truth, justice, goodness and beauty.
Especially now when fewer women are capable of love, men need to focus on loving God and, especially, on God's love for us.
The Illuminati have done a good job of discrediting God. He is the positive force behind Creation. He represents the inherent moral and natural design. By adhering to this design, we will be healthy and happy.
REALISTIC MARRIAGE
In olden times, men chose women for their worth as helpmates. Can she cook? Milk cows? Make clothes? They had no illusions about "soul mates." Men need to look for women who are gentle and accommodating, who have skills, character, personality and make good mothers.
Avoid promiscuous women, feminists and women who are alienated from their fathers. Avoid bean counters (women who want everything to be "equal.")
We need to take the stardust out of our eyes and realize that sex has been grossly exaggerated in importance in order to control us. Men are attracted to most fertile women. So what? That's nature's way of making sure we procreate. We don't need to be controlled by that.
In marriage, we are looking for a life long companion. Look at old TV shows to see the traditional picture of marriage. It's not heaven. Lucille Ball and Desi Arnez; Ralph and Alice Kramden were always comically at odds. It never gets boring.
Marriage is a mutual security pact. A woman accepts her husband's leadership in return for his protection and love. Men want power; women want love. Marriage is the exchange of the two.
Your spouse is nothing like you. There's going to be disagreements. It's not necessary to think alike or feel love all the time. Many women are moody.
Just keep your bargain. Be loyal. Don't say things that will upset her.
Play your part. And over time, with mutual trust, a strong bond grows.
And if you can't find a suitable companion, you may be in luck. Thoreau, a bachelor, said, "I never found the companion that was so companionable as solitude."
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
Promiscuity & The Death of Love
Promiscuity The Death of Love
November 9, 2010
Why women today are losing the ability to love, and how men must adjust.
From makow.com
by Henry Makow Ph.D.
If a young woman today said she was saving her virginity for her husband, she'd be considered hopelessly old fashioned. She'd be treated with disdain, as polite society treated a whore 100 years ago.
This is a measure of the triumph of Satanism, the "religion" of the modern world, also known as secularism. Not coincidentally, virgins also had to hide their purity in Bolshevik Russia.
The defining characteristic of civilization is the consecration of sex to marriage, or at the very least, love and courtship. Marriage and family are the red blood cells of a healthy society and the basis for procreation.
Satanists understand this very well. That's why they used "sexual liberation," to undermine humanity. As Giuseppe Mazzini said, "we corrupt in order to conquer."
They are like the devil. Corruption is a form of conquest.
FREE LOVE IS AN OXYMORON
The more sexual partners a young woman has, she less she is able to love a man. A woman's love must be exclusive. It must be focused on her husband, the father of her children. She must preserve her soul for him. That's what her body represents. By becoming a sexual free agent, she loses the ability to love.
For a woman, sex is an act of self-sacrifice and surrender. By definition, it requires trust, i.e. love and devotion to one man. When she has casual sex, inevitably she is disappointed and feels used. She starts to hate men and falls victim to feminism and lesbianism.
When men were required to get married in order to have sex, women were courted and loved. Later, they were honored for their contribution as wife and mother. Far from protecting "women's rights," feminism has left them twisting in the wind.
The separation of sex from marriage, i.e. "sexual liberation," is one of the principle ways satanism has killed love.
Wanton sex has become a substitute for love. Young women now market themselves as sex partners, not wives and mothers. Men are also trained to seek sex.
"Homosexual rights" is designed to make heterosexuals behave like homosexuals. Very few homosexuals marry. Very few have children. This is the model the elite envisages for mankind.
The Illuminati want us to be isolated, alienated and tractable.
A woman who is saving herself for marriage should be commended. She is resisting social pressure ( i.e. social engineering ) and obeying her instincts instead.
LOWERING EXPECTATIONS
Honeymooners.jpgThrough the mass media, the Illuminati brainwash us to think romantic love and sex are a universal panacea that cane replace religion (God.)
How many movies and songs are based on the assumption that some perfect person is the answer to our problems? Woody Allen is 75 and he's still chasing this romantic chimera in his movies. This is arrested development.
People aren't meant to be loved as though they were perfect. No one is. Only God is perfect and that is where our love should be directed. As you know, I define God in terms of spiritual ideals such as truth, justice, goodness and beauty.
Especially now when fewer women are capable of love, men need to focus on loving God and, especially, on God's love for us.
The Illuminati have done a good job of discrediting God. He is the positive force behind Creation. He represents the inherent moral and natural design. By adhering to this design, we will be healthy and happy.
REALISTIC MARRIAGE
In olden times, men chose women for their worth as helpmates. Can she cook? Milk cows? Make clothes? They had no illusions about "soul mates." Men need to look for women who are gentle and accommodating, who have skills, character, personality and make good mothers.
Avoid promiscuous women, feminists and women who are alienated from their fathers. Avoid bean counters (women who want everything to be "equal.")
We need to take the stardust out of our eyes and realize that sex has been grossly exaggerated in importance in order to control us. Men are attracted to most fertile women. So what? That's nature's way of making sure we procreate. We don't need to be controlled by that.
In marriage, we are looking for a life long companion. Look at old TV shows to see the traditional picture of marriage. It's not heaven. Lucille Ball and Desi Arnez; Ralph and Alice Kramden were always comically at odds. It never gets boring.
Marriage is a mutual security pact. A woman accepts her husband's leadership in return for his protection and love. Men want power; women want love. Marriage is the exchange of the two.
Your spouse is nothing like you. There's going to be disagreements. It's not necessary to think alike or feel love all the time. Many women are moody.
Just keep your bargain. Be loyal. Don't say things that will upset her.
Play your part. And over time, with mutual trust, a strong bond grows.
And if you can't find a suitable companion, you may be in luck. Thoreau, a bachelor, said, "I never found the companion that was so companionable as solitude."
November 9, 2010
Why women today are losing the ability to love, and how men must adjust.
From makow.com
by Henry Makow Ph.D.
If a young woman today said she was saving her virginity for her husband, she'd be considered hopelessly old fashioned. She'd be treated with disdain, as polite society treated a whore 100 years ago.
This is a measure of the triumph of Satanism, the "religion" of the modern world, also known as secularism. Not coincidentally, virgins also had to hide their purity in Bolshevik Russia.
The defining characteristic of civilization is the consecration of sex to marriage, or at the very least, love and courtship. Marriage and family are the red blood cells of a healthy society and the basis for procreation.
Satanists understand this very well. That's why they used "sexual liberation," to undermine humanity. As Giuseppe Mazzini said, "we corrupt in order to conquer."
They are like the devil. Corruption is a form of conquest.
FREE LOVE IS AN OXYMORON
The more sexual partners a young woman has, she less she is able to love a man. A woman's love must be exclusive. It must be focused on her husband, the father of her children. She must preserve her soul for him. That's what her body represents. By becoming a sexual free agent, she loses the ability to love.
For a woman, sex is an act of self-sacrifice and surrender. By definition, it requires trust, i.e. love and devotion to one man. When she has casual sex, inevitably she is disappointed and feels used. She starts to hate men and falls victim to feminism and lesbianism.
When men were required to get married in order to have sex, women were courted and loved. Later, they were honored for their contribution as wife and mother. Far from protecting "women's rights," feminism has left them twisting in the wind.
The separation of sex from marriage, i.e. "sexual liberation," is one of the principle ways satanism has killed love.
Wanton sex has become a substitute for love. Young women now market themselves as sex partners, not wives and mothers. Men are also trained to seek sex.
"Homosexual rights" is designed to make heterosexuals behave like homosexuals. Very few homosexuals marry. Very few have children. This is the model the elite envisages for mankind.
The Illuminati want us to be isolated, alienated and tractable.
A woman who is saving herself for marriage should be commended. She is resisting social pressure ( i.e. social engineering ) and obeying her instincts instead.
LOWERING EXPECTATIONS
Honeymooners.jpgThrough the mass media, the Illuminati brainwash us to think romantic love and sex are a universal panacea that cane replace religion (God.)
How many movies and songs are based on the assumption that some perfect person is the answer to our problems? Woody Allen is 75 and he's still chasing this romantic chimera in his movies. This is arrested development.
People aren't meant to be loved as though they were perfect. No one is. Only God is perfect and that is where our love should be directed. As you know, I define God in terms of spiritual ideals such as truth, justice, goodness and beauty.
Especially now when fewer women are capable of love, men need to focus on loving God and, especially, on God's love for us.
The Illuminati have done a good job of discrediting God. He is the positive force behind Creation. He represents the inherent moral and natural design. By adhering to this design, we will be healthy and happy.
REALISTIC MARRIAGE
In olden times, men chose women for their worth as helpmates. Can she cook? Milk cows? Make clothes? They had no illusions about "soul mates." Men need to look for women who are gentle and accommodating, who have skills, character, personality and make good mothers.
Avoid promiscuous women, feminists and women who are alienated from their fathers. Avoid bean counters (women who want everything to be "equal.")
We need to take the stardust out of our eyes and realize that sex has been grossly exaggerated in importance in order to control us. Men are attracted to most fertile women. So what? That's nature's way of making sure we procreate. We don't need to be controlled by that.
In marriage, we are looking for a life long companion. Look at old TV shows to see the traditional picture of marriage. It's not heaven. Lucille Ball and Desi Arnez; Ralph and Alice Kramden were always comically at odds. It never gets boring.
Marriage is a mutual security pact. A woman accepts her husband's leadership in return for his protection and love. Men want power; women want love. Marriage is the exchange of the two.
Your spouse is nothing like you. There's going to be disagreements. It's not necessary to think alike or feel love all the time. Many women are moody.
Just keep your bargain. Be loyal. Don't say things that will upset her.
Play your part. And over time, with mutual trust, a strong bond grows.
And if you can't find a suitable companion, you may be in luck. Thoreau, a bachelor, said, "I never found the companion that was so companionable as solitude."
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
He Reasons Ill...
"He reason ill who tell that Vaisnavas die when thou art still living in sound."- Bhaktivinoda Thakura
Dear Srila Prabhupada,
On this day of remembrance on the disappearance of your physical presence from this world we take solace in the fact that we are listening to you speak as we write this.
You had the foresight to have your words recorded for the benefit of future generations. However we future generations are so wretched that we hardly care to listen to your words in order to get the 'full' picture. I pray to your Lord, Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu that He will inspire all of your proclaimed followers around the world to take your words into their hearts and meditate on them deeply for the benefit of all humanity.
Praying to one day be called a servant of your servant- I Joshua Hawley remain fallen at your lotus feet.
Dear Srila Prabhupada,
On this day of remembrance on the disappearance of your physical presence from this world we take solace in the fact that we are listening to you speak as we write this.
You had the foresight to have your words recorded for the benefit of future generations. However we future generations are so wretched that we hardly care to listen to your words in order to get the 'full' picture. I pray to your Lord, Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu that He will inspire all of your proclaimed followers around the world to take your words into their hearts and meditate on them deeply for the benefit of all humanity.
Praying to one day be called a servant of your servant- I Joshua Hawley remain fallen at your lotus feet.
Sunday, November 7, 2010
The Fallacy of Hinduism
Josh Hawley-
I am continually surprised and amazed whenever I meet supposedly educated pandits, who know the Vedic mantras and the different yajnas and samskaras but who are simultaneously grossly ignorant of the origin of the concept of Hindu. I met a pandit the other day who was speaking about "our Hindu Dharma."
This idea is a gross fallacy and the fact that it is being perpetuated by the pandits and brahmans of India is a testament to the power and efficacy of the subjugation of India first by the Moghuls and then by the British.
The first Muslim invaders who ransacked India came upon the modern day Indus River, (in those days known as the river Sindh) and they simply labeled all the people on the other side of this river as Hindus since they could not properly pronounce the word Sindh. This label "Hindu" was perpetuated for nearly eight hundred years of muslim ransacking and rule. This labeling of the whole population of India as Hindu was further perpetuated and in a sense perfected by the British who enlisted the help of scholars like Maxmillian and other Sanskrit scholars to actively mis- translate the Vedas in favor of the European held view of Christianity.
This mistranslated version of the Vedic Sastras was then systematically taught in all education institutions throughout India as the system of "Hindu Dharma".
However upon careful examination of the Vedic Sastras, Puranas, Upanishads, Itihasas, Tantras etc, we find no mention of the word Hindu anywhere through out.
Indeed the only proper terms to identify the culture of ancient India (Bharata Varsa) is Varnasrama Dharma or Sanatana Dharma.
To say that one is a Hindu is an admission that one is a subjugated and conquered individual first by the Muslims and then by the British.
The idea that the Vedic sastras are mythical or made up is wholly ridiculous and entirely contradicts the very supposition of an absolute platform from which religion is supposed to be based.
Further evidence of the Vedic Culture is found through the world. In Russia there is what is known as the Russian Veda. In Europe the Scandanavian countries are known as such due to the Ksatriyas who lived there worshiped the demigod of war known as Skanda. In Brazil have been found the Deity form of Hanuman. In Greece the ancient worship of Rhoda and Kristos (RadhaKrishna). Etc etc. Not to mention the countless numbers of verbal histories handed down through out numerous indigenous cultures throughout the world.
The Puranas or histories of Bharata describe that all people are coming from India or Bharata Varsha. The Africans were forced out of Bharata for there unscrupulous habits of theft etc. The Egyptians left India because they were worshiping the Sun as the Supreme. The Yavanas or Turks are mentioned in Srimad Bhagavatam, and were eventually driven out of India for their failure to properly follow the Vedic injunctions. Lord Parasurama drove out the Ksatriyas or the Europeans etc.
From the Vedic literatures we find mention of all the races currently occupying the planet, as having descended from the land of Bharata and having originally belonged the the great Vedic Culture. Linguists recognize the root of all languages as Sanskrit.
Nowadays in our highly politicized and ignorantly divided world there is little room for the truth. Indeed if the light of the truth of the Veda reaches the mass of mankind in its actual form the whole of humanity will be liberated from its blind destruction.
I am continually surprised and amazed whenever I meet supposedly educated pandits, who know the Vedic mantras and the different yajnas and samskaras but who are simultaneously grossly ignorant of the origin of the concept of Hindu. I met a pandit the other day who was speaking about "our Hindu Dharma."
This idea is a gross fallacy and the fact that it is being perpetuated by the pandits and brahmans of India is a testament to the power and efficacy of the subjugation of India first by the Moghuls and then by the British.
The first Muslim invaders who ransacked India came upon the modern day Indus River, (in those days known as the river Sindh) and they simply labeled all the people on the other side of this river as Hindus since they could not properly pronounce the word Sindh. This label "Hindu" was perpetuated for nearly eight hundred years of muslim ransacking and rule. This labeling of the whole population of India as Hindu was further perpetuated and in a sense perfected by the British who enlisted the help of scholars like Maxmillian and other Sanskrit scholars to actively mis- translate the Vedas in favor of the European held view of Christianity.
This mistranslated version of the Vedic Sastras was then systematically taught in all education institutions throughout India as the system of "Hindu Dharma".
However upon careful examination of the Vedic Sastras, Puranas, Upanishads, Itihasas, Tantras etc, we find no mention of the word Hindu anywhere through out.
Indeed the only proper terms to identify the culture of ancient India (Bharata Varsa) is Varnasrama Dharma or Sanatana Dharma.
To say that one is a Hindu is an admission that one is a subjugated and conquered individual first by the Muslims and then by the British.
The idea that the Vedic sastras are mythical or made up is wholly ridiculous and entirely contradicts the very supposition of an absolute platform from which religion is supposed to be based.
Further evidence of the Vedic Culture is found through the world. In Russia there is what is known as the Russian Veda. In Europe the Scandanavian countries are known as such due to the Ksatriyas who lived there worshiped the demigod of war known as Skanda. In Brazil have been found the Deity form of Hanuman. In Greece the ancient worship of Rhoda and Kristos (RadhaKrishna). Etc etc. Not to mention the countless numbers of verbal histories handed down through out numerous indigenous cultures throughout the world.
The Puranas or histories of Bharata describe that all people are coming from India or Bharata Varsha. The Africans were forced out of Bharata for there unscrupulous habits of theft etc. The Egyptians left India because they were worshiping the Sun as the Supreme. The Yavanas or Turks are mentioned in Srimad Bhagavatam, and were eventually driven out of India for their failure to properly follow the Vedic injunctions. Lord Parasurama drove out the Ksatriyas or the Europeans etc.
From the Vedic literatures we find mention of all the races currently occupying the planet, as having descended from the land of Bharata and having originally belonged the the great Vedic Culture. Linguists recognize the root of all languages as Sanskrit.
Nowadays in our highly politicized and ignorantly divided world there is little room for the truth. Indeed if the light of the truth of the Veda reaches the mass of mankind in its actual form the whole of humanity will be liberated from its blind destruction.
Saturday, November 6, 2010
Head Kick Ko's (Mute the sound)
Some sick head kick KO's mostly from Japan K-1, and some Muay Thai as well. Mute the volume cause the music sucks.
Monday, November 1, 2010
David Nutt: Alcohol More Dangerous Than Crack
(CBS/AP) What's worse for us, alcohol or crack cocaine? Careful - this isn't a no-brainer.
A new study says alcohol is more destructive than illegal drugs like heroin and crack.
British scientists, lead by Dr. David Nutt at the University of Bristol, evaluated these three drugs, as well as ecstasy and marijuana (20 drugs in all), ranking each of them on the following criteria: physical harm to the user, how addictive it is, and the effect of its use on families, communities, and society.
They included economic costs like health care, social services, and prison.
Heroin, crack and crystal meth are deadliest to the individual user, the study showed, but when their wider social effects are taken into account, alcohol is the most damaging, followed by heroin and crack.
Experts said alcohol scored so high because it's so widely used and has devastating consequences not only for drinkers but for those around them. Excessive drinking damages nearly all organ systems, and is also connected to higher death rates. It's also involved in a greater percentage of crime than most other drugs, including heroin.
Marijuana, ecstasy and LSD scored far lower, according to the study, published in the "The Lancet."
Experts said the study should prompt countries to reconsider how they classify drugs. Last year, Britain increased its penalties for the possession of marijuana.
Some experts were critical of that decision, including Dr. Nutt. He was fired from his position as the U.K. chief drugs adviser soon after.
"What governments decide is illegal is not always based on science," says Leslie King, an adviser to the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and one of the study's authors. "Drugs that are legal cause at least as much damage, if not more, than drugs that are illicit."
A new study says alcohol is more destructive than illegal drugs like heroin and crack.
British scientists, lead by Dr. David Nutt at the University of Bristol, evaluated these three drugs, as well as ecstasy and marijuana (20 drugs in all), ranking each of them on the following criteria: physical harm to the user, how addictive it is, and the effect of its use on families, communities, and society.
They included economic costs like health care, social services, and prison.
Heroin, crack and crystal meth are deadliest to the individual user, the study showed, but when their wider social effects are taken into account, alcohol is the most damaging, followed by heroin and crack.
Experts said alcohol scored so high because it's so widely used and has devastating consequences not only for drinkers but for those around them. Excessive drinking damages nearly all organ systems, and is also connected to higher death rates. It's also involved in a greater percentage of crime than most other drugs, including heroin.
Marijuana, ecstasy and LSD scored far lower, according to the study, published in the "The Lancet."
Experts said the study should prompt countries to reconsider how they classify drugs. Last year, Britain increased its penalties for the possession of marijuana.
Some experts were critical of that decision, including Dr. Nutt. He was fired from his position as the U.K. chief drugs adviser soon after.
"What governments decide is illegal is not always based on science," says Leslie King, an adviser to the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and one of the study's authors. "Drugs that are legal cause at least as much damage, if not more, than drugs that are illicit."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
